1) Does Ross’s other things equal duty correspond to Kant’s perfect duty, and all things considered duties, to Kant’s imperfect duty? In which category should we allocate the duty to obey?
2) I am born now in any given state, thus -as Rawls seems to say (p. 302)- I have a natural duty to obey the Constitution. If such Constitution is not just, but it has not been controverted by the country’s population, would I still be bound by it? When am I able (in his theory) to assess whether the law is just or not?