Challenges & Solutions
                                    Abschlussbedingungen
                                    
                        
                        Changes to procedure during study administration
- Deviations are common.
 - Unexpected things can always happen during data collection (e.g. participants might behave drastically different than expected, making changes in your plans inevitable)
 - This does not make your preregistration obsolete!
 
Solution
- Document changes to preregistry. Transparantly report where and why changes were made
 - Other researchers will benefit from described changes
 
Discovery of assumption violations during analysis
- Your data might be differently distributed than expected; you might need to change analysis
 
Solution
- Preregister incrementally for pre-defined stages (e.g. first preregister evaluation of distributional forms, then preregister model, ...).
 - OR Blind dataset (i.e. scramble outcomes) until all assumptions are tested.
 - OR Preregister decision-trees (e.g. specify testing a normality assumption and, depending on outcome, selection of test A or B).
 - OR Design a standard operating procedure (SOP) = describe decision rules for handling data, include more general rules than decision trees.
 
Data are pre-existing
- You want to use data collected by other researchers?
 - You will not be able to prove that you did not see data before formulation of hypotheses
 
Solution
- Register analysis plans and transparently provide insight about potential biases and unfluences (What was and what was not known before?)
 
Longitudinal studies and large, multivariate datasets
- Project often involve large, multivariate datasets = impossible to preregister all design of all studies resulting from project
 
Solution
- Solutions to the first challenges apply here (see above).
 - Incremental Preregistration.
 
Many experiments
- You conduct many experiments with similar designs = data acquisition is so simple that any effort that would go into a preregistration would be considered inefficient
 
Solution
- Establish preregistration templates for defining variables and parameters for the protocol
 
A program of research (i.e. multiple tests)
- If an area of research is high risk, most research outcomes are null results, and the infrequent positive results have huge implications
 
Solution
- Preregistration enables a transparent assessment of multiple tests only if preregistration and results of analysis plans are permanently preserved and accessible for review
 
Few a priori expectations ("Discovery Research")
- It seems useless to preregister when you don't have hypotheses
 
Solution
- Register a first study with a simple analysis plan for exploratory analysis with the goal of generating hypotheses.
 - This forms the basis for a subsequent preregistration for a second study to test the generated hypotheses.
 - OR preregister a cross-validation process (i.e. dataset it split in two; one part is used for exploratory analysis, the other part remains sealed until exploration is complete)
 
Competing predictions
- This is not really a challenge. Given a certain study design and analysis plan, you can have multiple hypotheses and if you have preregistered those, the data will provide trustworthy support for one or another.
 
Solution
- Preregister multiple predictions simultaneously
 
Narrative inferences and conclusions (i.e. I want to stress the interesting results in the presentation of the paper)
- To honor the ultimate goal of preregistration and open science, it is also important to keep it in mind when writing up your study conclusions. Even if a researcher preregisters and reports the result according to the predictions, they can still have exploratory extra-results in the paper and it might be tempting to focus on surprising, interesting results in the discussions & conclusions section.
 - Preregistration does not dictate the narrative design of a paper (Interpretation and narrative conclusions are an important stimulus in the development of theory!)
 - Preregistration merely facilitates transparency in interpretations (I as a researcher display one opinion, other views/interpretations can be applied)
 
References
This is a summary of the article "The preregistration revolution" (Nosek, Ebersole, DeHaven, & Mellor, (2017).
For more information: https://osf.io/2dxu5/
Zuletzt geändert: Donnerstag, 24. April 2025, 13:27