(1) A question of understanding: Does Sleat view the realist approach to legitimacy as one where a claim to legitimacy is any that conforms to the shared norms within society and isn't coerced through power? (hence differentiating it from Real Politik)
(2) If this is the case, then how does it differentiate from Beetham who claims that power is legitimate if it conforms to the rules that are created by and conform to underlying norms and beliefs in society?