1. Could you please explain/elaborate on Rhees' statement, the "relation" seems to be an internal one, not like my relation to the park when I am in it. When I am not in the park, this will make no difference to the park or to me. But we cannot think of the state without thinking of individual citizens or vice-versa. But neither is "the relation of the individual to the state" at all like "the relation of the individual wolf to the pack" or "the relation of the individual to the crowd". These could be understood as quasi-physical relations and the relation of the individual to the state is not that. It has rather to be studied, apparently, in terms of obligation.'
2. It would be interesting to discuss the notion of "amoralist" and "immoralist" as the definitions are not familiar to me.