1) Rawls mentions several times that Civil Disobedience can be justified in a scenario of a "nearly just" society. What are the sufficient and/or necessary conditions for a society to be considered "nearly just"? Has a "well-ordered society" or a "completely just society" ever existed, or is it a idealization for the purpose of political analysis?
2) Rawls makes it very clear that his account of Civil Disobedience concerns democratic societies. What would he say about act of disobedience in dictatorships and authoritarian regimes, such as, for example, China or some middle eastern countries?