The course introduces students to Kant’s theory of peace. It then uses this introduction to highlight the
difference between Kant’s model and the model one can infer from the democratic (or liberal) peace theory,
namely, the explanation of the alleged fact that democracies have never fought each other. It concludes
by discussing how each model would account for the Russian aggression against Ukraine and for the Israeli
response to Hamas’ terrorist attack of October 7th 2023. What are the causes of these conflicts on the two
models? Is the fact that Russia is an authoritarian regime and Hamas a terrostis group the sole relevant
fact? Since Russia and Ukraine, as well as Israel and Gaza, were and in part still are highly interdependent
in their economies, are we witnessing a gigantic falsification of the liberal doctrine of doux commerce to
which Kant’s third pillar of peace (cosmopolitan right) is often reduced? Does the fact that Russia still was
at the beginning of the war a member of the Council of Europe count as a falsification of the second pillar,
namely the idea that co-membership in a supranational federation averts war? Does the ineffectiveness of
UN’s repeated stigmatization Israeli’s illegal occupation of Palestinian territory count as proof that IGOs
are unable to prevent wars?
The course presupposes active participation. Students are required to select at least one text from the
reading list and present it to their colleagues. It is expected that students read the material before class
and participate in the discussion of the material presented. In addition to in-class presentations, students
are required to write a 10-15 pages final paper on a topic relevant to the course, or to take a final oral
exam.
- Kursleiter/in: Sila Göylüsün